BLOGThe Bird's Eye View
Timely Perspectives, Unconventional Thinking
We’re excited to share timely market insights, thoughtful perspectives and expert commentary as part of our commitment to providing modern investment solutions to modern challenges.
BLOGThe Bird's Eye View
Timely Perspectives, Unconventional Thinking
We’re excited to share timely market insights, thoughtful perspectives and expert commentary as part of our commitment to providing modern investment solutions to modern challenges.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely expected to transform productivity and reshape labor markets. While we have already begun to see measurable productivity gains in certain areas, we believe that large-scale impacts may take longer to come to fruition.
Companies in Japan have already been using AI to help address workforce shortages amid a labor-constrained economy. The clearest productivity gains can be found in software engineering, where AI-assisted coding has already improved efficiency and boosted productivity. Beyond software development, however, most companies are still testing AI applications, making it difficult to identify measurable improvements in labor productivity or business performance.
This does not necessarily mean AI is overhyped, but rather that near-term expectations may be running ahead of reality. History suggests that the adoption of general-purpose technologies is a gradual process. New technologies are initially used to improve existing tasks by making them slightly faster or more efficient, and the greatest productivity gains typically occur later, when businesses redesign workflows and develop entirely new applications. For example, the personal computer’s transformative impact only emerged after organizations recognized its potential to be more than an advanced calculator or typewriter and reimagined how work could be performed.
AI’s near-term expectations may be running ahead of reality.
While current expectations for AI may exceed its real-world impact in the near term, this mismatch is not unusual for groundbreaking technologies. History has repeatedly shown that society tends to overestimate the short-term effects of innovation while underestimating its long-term influence. AI may follow this familiar pattern, with its most significant economic and productivity benefits unfolding over the coming decades rather than the next few years.
After surging to a new all-time nominal high in January, the gold price consolidated in February and sold off following the outbreak of conflict in the Middle East. Since that time, the positive inflection in job openings and the Federal Reserve’s more hawkish stance has pushed up expectations for short-term real interest rates and prompted a derating in gold, which is down nearly 8% year-to-date.1
As a result, gold has moved closer to its long-term geometric average relative to the stock of US Treasuries, down from its premium valuation in January and February. While higher interest rates may be supporting the US dollar, we also note that higher rates undermine the fiscal viability of servicing government debt as the stock of debt rolls into higher rates. In our view, the valuation of gold appears more compelling at current levels, particularly given the confluence of a generationally high stock of debt to GDP, persistent primary deficits, aging demographics in the US and growing defense spending needs.2
In comparison, gold was closer to its long-term geometric average relative to the S&P 500 Index earlier this year and is now below its historical valuation relative to equities.3 Low risk aversions in both equity and credit markets are supporting late-cycle spending and exuberance, as evidenced by the successful initial public offering of SpaceX and recent rally in semiconductor stocks.4 Should markets encounter an unexpected crisis, this may support a positive drift to the value of gold.
We continue to believe gold is best suited as a strategic allocation against adverse events, not as a tactical trade. In our view, its long-term fundamental drivers—persistent geopolitical turmoil and troubling government debt dynamics among them—currently remain intact, as does the case for strategic exposure to a potential hedge like gold.



