Macro & Market Views
The Small Idea: The Tide Is High
The Small Idea: The Tide Is High
While the underperformance of small cap stocks relative to larger names over the past decade-plus has been disappointing, a range of factors may coalesce to ease what has been a key breakwater for the market segment: middling earnings growth. We ponder the forces that in the years ahead could unleash a wave of bottom-line growth, including improving revenues and margins, lower interest rates, a more benign regulatory environment and reenergized mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and capital markets activity.
Growth Has Been Elusive, but Change May Be Afoot
Given the increasing number of money-losing small cap companies since the global financial crisis— 45% of the Russell 2000 Index lost money on a trailing-12-month basis through the end of the third quarter—lackluster earnings at the benchmark for relative under-performance as market capitalization preferences.1 However, there are reasons to believe resuscitated earnings may finally be in prospect for 2025 as accelerating top-line growth and continued margin improvements filter through to the bottom line, as shown in Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2. As we discuss below, multiple forces at the industry level could amplify company-specific earnings momentum.
Exhibit 1. Sales Growth Is Forecast to Accelerate in 2025…
Realized and Estimated Russell 2000 Index Year-Over-Year Sales Growth, Third Quarter 2023 through Fourth Quarter 2025

Source. Furey Research Partners, FactSet; data as of November 14, 2024.
Exhibit 2 …Boosting Margins and Earnings Growth
Realized and Estimated Russell 2000 Index Year-Over-Year Earnings Growth, Second Quarter 2023 through Third Quarter 2025

Source: Furey Research Partners, FactSet; data as of November 14, 2024.
As small caps overall are more leveraged to floating-rate debt than larger companies, further Federal Reserve policy easing beyond the 100 basis points worth of rate cuts in 2024 would have a meaningfully positive incremental impact on these businesses’ interest expenses. While we won’t hazard a guess at the trajectory of Fed policy going forward, the latest dot plot Federal Open Market Committee forecasts suggest an additional 50 basis points of cuts are on tap in 2025.2 A educed cost of capital across the US economy—for both consumers and levered small cap companies—could trigger a resurgence in small cap stocks, especially those in the housing, consumer discretionary and energy sectors. In addition to reducing borrowing costs and buoying economic activity, lower rates historically have lured investment capital in from the sidelines, propelling small caps higher.3
Even without further rate relief, however, small cap balance sheets are the strongest they’ve been since the global financial crisis, in our view. Improved supply-chain management post-Covid has helped managers rationalize inventories and reduce working capital. Some companies have been able to leverage the proliferation of cloud applications to reduce the capital intensity of their businesses and improve operating leverage; specifically, what had been large, fixed-hardware infrastructure investments financed through capital expenditures become variable operational costs.
Policy Changes and Regulatory Reform May Have an Outsized Impact on Smaller Companies
In addition to wider operating margins, strengthened balance sheets and potentially lower rates, prospective policy changes and easier regulations facilitated by the 2024 Republican sweep of the November US elections could serve as an additional tailwind to earnings growth for US-domiciled companies. This could be especially true for smaller companies, in our view. Not only do large companies have the scale to monitor and adapt to regulatory changes, their lobbying muscle often enables them to influence regulations at the design stage to their benefit. Smaller companies, in contrast, usually are left to “play it as it lays” and bear the fixed costs of compliance over a smaller base. A less restrictive regulatory environment may have an amplified salutary impact on small companies.
Tariffs. Given that we already operate in a trade-protected world, the impact of any new tariffs will be incremental rather than de novo, potentially limiting their overall effect. That said, any redomestication of manufacturing would likely benefit US-centric producers, including the small cap companies that in the aggregate source about 90% of revenue from home.4
Taxes. While many of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 affecting individual taxpayers are set to expire at the end of 2025 barring Congressional intervention—which seems likely given the results of the US election—changes to the corporate tax code were made permanent at the time of the bill’s passage. That said, Trump on the campaign trail proposed further easing of corporate taxes, including lowering them to 15% for domestic production.5 As corporate taxes tend to be regressive, US-focused small cap companies may be particularly well positioned for tax savings that could be redirected to reducing fixed costs and thus enhancing margins and productivity.
Regulations. As president, Trump reportedly is prepared to nullify “thousands” of rules and regulations he and his team deem to represent executive overreach.6 Generally speaking, such a dismantling of the regulatory state would reduce outlays on compliance—with consumer protection laws, for example, or environmental requirements— and thus operating costs, boosting margins and profitability. Meanwhile, looser antitrust provisions could unleash a spate of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), potentially triggering buyout premiums for targeted small cap companies.
Enhanced Efficiency/Reduced Government Spending. Improved efficiency and the elimination of unnecessary federal expenditures could reduce government spending and Treasury issuance, enabling assets that would otherwise be invested in government debt to be put to better use in the private sector. That said, discretionary nondefense spending represents only about 15% of total federal outlays; efforts to rein in government spending without reform to popular and politically untouchable entitlements like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid seem unlikely to have a meaningful impact on the country’s fiscal trajectory.7
Industry-Specific Trends Could Lift a Narrower Swath of Small Cap Companies
Beyond the potentially broad sweep of policy changes under the new administration, industry-specific developments could benefit a more focused range of small cap companies.
Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI could be even more meaningful over a long cycle than the dawn of the internet was in 2000, transforming companies across industries and capitalizations into more efficient digital- and data-driven operations, resulting in reduced costs and faster innovation. Sectors already deep in the digital space like finance, healthcare and logistics could be especially well positioned to benefit from emerging technologies. Additionally, much as the telcos had early-mover advantage into broadband communications in the 1980s, many smaller companies may be able to tweak their business models for relevance in a new AI-driven world rather than embark upon a whole-scale reinvention. For example, one small cap manufacturer in the Midwest has leveraged its century-plus of expertise in thermal management for trucks and tractors to produce cooling systems for data centers.8
Energy/Industrials. AI’s broad penetration across industries is driving a spike in demand for energy; data centers are projected to account for 11–12% of US power demand by 2030, up from 3–4% today.9 Meeting this demand will present opportunities for an array of businesses, from drillers and oil servicers to the providers of power infrastructure.
Biotech. Well represented by small caps, the biotech industry is almost purely domestic and therefore leveraged to positive effects from regulatory easing. Looser policies for developing and approving new drugs could facilitate major improvements—perhaps even breakthrough discoveries—in a range of treatment and therapies, unleashing heretofore unseen earnings power.
Financials. While potential regulatory reform and lower capital requirements could compromise the balance sheets of small banks over the long term, a less burdensome regulatory environment likely would reduce compliance costs in the short term. Separately, continued market share gains by private capital providers could squeeze out the weakest local banks, forcing mergers and/or closures and paving the way for a new breed of small cap banks—notably, semi-regionals centered in the South and lower-tax states—with higher profitability and faster growth.
Security Selection and Price Discipline Underpin Resilience
Within the context of a long period of relative small cap underperformance, it’s worth remembering that small caps historically have been the most rewarding sector of the market over the long run back to 1927.10 Although a lagging market can be unsettling in the short term, it can also provide opportunity to buy good companies at attractive valuations. Should growth prospects broaden beyond a narrow cohort of megacap tech stocks, thoughtful active management rather than passive beta exposure may once again be the key to investment success.11
Regulatory Shift May Result in Both More Takeouts and New Names
The installation of more business-friendly leadership in such US offices as the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission may grease the wheels for M&A activity, as well-financed businesses perceive fewer impediments to growth through strategic acquisitions of smaller companies. Initial public offerings (IPOs), too, could see an uptick. For example, reduced regulation may facilitate the development of new drugs/therapeutics, increasing private market valuations for biotech companies and incenting early investors to cash out through a public listing. In the industrial space, new “pick and shovel” companies may emerge to provide essential services and support to facilitate the propagation of new technologies like AI, not unlike the late-1990s facilitators of the internet boom. On the demand side, investors previously skeptical of AI could reevaluate the opportunity cost of their lack of exposure to the sector, supporting a wave of IPO interest.
1. Source: FactSet; data as of December 31, 2024.
2. Source: Federal Reserve; data as of December 18, 2024.
3. Source: JP Morgan; data as of July 22,2024.
4. Source: FactSet; data as of December 31, 2024.
5. Source: S&P Global; data as of November 12, 2024.
6. Source: The Wall Street Journal; data as of November 20, 2024.
7. Source: US Department of the Treasury; data as of December 12, 2024.
8. Source: Company reports; data as of September 11, 2024.
9. Source: McKinsey & Company; data as of September 1, 2024.
10. Source: Fama-French Data Library; data as of December 31, 2024.
11. Source: Morningstar; data as of December 31, 2024.
The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the firm. These materials are provided for informational purposes only. These opinions are not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results, or investment advice. Any statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy of this information cannot be guaranteed. The views expressed herein may change at any time subsequent to the date of issue hereof. The information provided is not to be construed as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell or the solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any fund or security.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Risk Disclosures
All investments involve the risk of loss of principal.
There are risks associated with investing in securities of foreign countries, such as erratic market conditions, economic and political instability and fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
The value and liquidity of portfolio holdings may fluctuate in response to events specific to the companies or markets, as well as economic, political or social events in the US or abroad. During periods of market volatility, the value of individual securities and other investments at times may decline significantly and rapidly. The securities of small and micro-size companies can be more volatile in price than those of larger companies and may be more difficult or expensive to trade.
Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.
Definitions
Beta is a measure of an investment’s price volatility relative to that of the overall market.
Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
Russell 2000® Index (Gross/Total) measures the performance of the small cap segment of the US equity universe. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. A total-return index tracks price changes and reinvestment of distribution income.
FEF Distributors, LLC (“FEFD”) (SIPC), a limited purpose broker-dealer, distributes certain First Eagle products. FEFD does not provide services to any investor, but rather provides services to its First Eagle affiliates. As such, when FEFD presents a fund, strategy or other product to a prospective investor, FEFD and its representatives do not determine whether an investment in the fund, strategy or other product is in the best interests of, or is otherwise beneficial or suitable for, the investor. No statement by FEFD should be construed as a recommendation. Investors should exercise their own judgment and/or consult with a financial professional to determine whether it is advisable for the investor to invest in any First Eagle fund, strategy, or product.
First Eagle Investments is the brand name for First Eagle Investment Management, LLC and its subsidiary investment advisers.
©2025 First Eagle Investment Management, LLC. All rights reserved.