Commentaries

Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Commentary

Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Commentary

Market Overview

As of September 30, 2025

The technical headwinds that held back municipal bond performance in the second quarter finally began to ease in the third quarter, setting the stage for a rally in September.

Though muni issuance remained robust over the last three months, renewed flows into mutual funds and exchange-traded funds following April’s tariff-related dislocation helped the market absorb the new supply. The resulting performance pushed muni indexes well into positive territory for the year to date following a sluggish first half, though they still lag other fixed income assets. The S&P Municipal Bond High Yield Index gained 2.3% during the third quarter, while the S&P Municipal Yield Index, which includes bonds across the quality spectrum, rose 2.6% and the S&P Short Duration Municipal Yield Index advanced 1.8%; year to date, those indexes are up a respective 1.7%, 1.8% and 3.6%. For context, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index gained 2.0% during the quarter and 6.1% thus far in 2025.1

Continued Heavy Supply Was Met by Renewed Demand 

Long US Treasury yields eased slightly in the third quarter, with 10-year and 30-year rates posting single-digit declines. The AAA muni curve was a bit more active, with bonds of those same maturities declining 30 basis points or so.2

While municipal bonds had a good quarter, perhaps more impressive than the magnitude of returns was that they were achieved in the face of continued heavy new supply. Third quarter issuance was down slightly from the second quarter, but the year-to-date pace suggests 2025 is likely to top 2024’s record for annual volume. Notably, the long-dated nature of high yield muni issuance in general provides a steepening impulse to the yield curve, and the municipal bond curve has steepened considerably amid the flood of issuance.3

There are a few factors we believe have contributed to the ongoing surge in issuance. After sitting on the sidelines during the 2022–23 rate-hike period, municipalities have a pent-up need to issue paper as the benefits of Covid-era federal funding and post-pandemic tax receipts wane. Meanwhile, pretty much every capital project costs more today due to the impact of inflation across inputs like steel, concrete, lumber, civil engineering, skilled and unskilled labor, etc. Further, potential legislative threats to muni bond tax treatment—since alleviated—likely pulled forward some issuance to the first half of the year.

Fortunately, supply during the third quarter was met by renewed demand; after about $9 billion of outflows during late March and April alongside the initial shock of Trump’s tariff policies, positive municipal bond fund flows returned in May and have persisted.4 Though tariffs remain a wildcard, investors seem to have gotten comfortable with the uncertainty. The worst of the expected inflationary impacts haven’t yet been realized, and signs that the most severe levies could be walked back, either through bilateral negotiation or judicial mandate, lends hope that trade policy may be less of a headwind.

Meanwhile, the passage of the budget reconciliation bill in early July removed an overhang to muni bond demand. Putting aside the provisions of the bill, the key for muni bond investors is what the bill lacked—namely, any adjustments to the tax-exempt status of municipal bond interest income. There had been some chatter that policymakers were considering changes to or restrictions on the muni bond tax exemption as part of this tax-and-spending plan. While a disruption to the status quo seemed an unlikely result of the recent legislative process, the certainty provided by the final bill was welcomed by both investors and issuers.

Also supporting demand for muni bonds has been the dovish tilt of the Federal Reserve. Throughout the third quarter investors sought to get a clear read on the central bank struggling to balance the weakening labor market against above-target inflation. Deciding the former is of greater concern at the moment, the central bank delivered a well-telegraphed 25 basis point cut to its policy rate in September, and markets have priced in an additional 50 basis points of rate cuts by year end.5 Should the Fed’s more accommodative policy continue to weigh on long-term yields, investors may increasingly view municipal bonds as a more appealing cash equivalent.

Fundamentals Remain Encouraging 

Municipalities entered 2025 in strong fiscal condition, and issuer fundamentals continue to be supportive. State budgets for fiscal 2026 generally reflect a healthy environment, with fund balances well above the historical average.6 Though state general fund revenue has fallen off the record pace of fiscal 2021 and 2022 as the impact of Covid-era relief waned, it has continued to grow, and modest revenue gains are expected in fiscal 2026. Budgets that have been enacted to date call for only small increases in general fund spending, and most states plan to maintain or increase the size of their state’s rainy-day fund—many of which are already at nominal highs—in anticipation of future needs.

Another sign of fiscal strength can be found in improvement in pension funding, as the aggregate median ratio for local government pensions climbed to 80% in fiscal 2024 from 78% in fiscal 2022. While this can be attributed in part to market performance, local governments have increased contributions and tweaked their benefit structures, demonstrating improved funding discipline and better long-term sustainability.7

All in all, muni bond ratings activity has continued to be positive in 2025, but just barely: positive activity (including both upgrades and favorable outlook revisions) outpaced negative activity at a rate of 1.1x year to date; this ratio stood at 3.5x in 2022.8 Defaults remain very low, even by the standards of an asset class accustomed to very low default activity.9

Start of a Turnaround? 

Year-to-date muni bond performance flipped from negative to positive during the third quarter, and we’re hopeful that the period represented an inflection point after what was a challenging first half for the asset class. It seems likely to us that the factors driving recent performance and fund flows—credit stability, certainty around tax treatment, an accommodative Fed and relatively benign tariff impacts—will continue to support the asset class.

With a yield to worst of 5.7%, the Bloomberg US High Yield Municipal Index continues to offer investors an attractive entry point, in our view.10 Although the outperformance of munis during the quarter pushed muni-Treasury ratios somewhat lower, current levels—70% for 10-year and 90% for 30-year maturities—suggest there is still significant relative value to be found on the longer end of the municipal bond curve, which is also most likely to benefit from an environment of stable or declining rates given its current steepness.11

We remain focused on seeking to provide a high level of tax-free current income through bottom-up security selection complemented by an active trading strategy and the prudent application of leverage. This approach, combined with consistent fund inflows, has enabled us to increase the interest income generated by the portfolio in 2025, and we have passed this along to shareholders in the form of a higher monthly distribution rate.

Portfolio Review

Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund A Shares (without sales charge*) posted a return of 0.06% in third quarter 2025. The Fund underperformed the S&P Short Duration Municipal Index in the period.

The leading contributors to performance during the quarter were bonds linked to the Brightline passenger rail projects in Florida and California/Nevada, a health care facility expansion in New York and the refurbishment of an airport maintenance base in Oklahoma.

Brightline, which is backed by private equity firm Fortress Investment Group, is the only privately owned and operated intercity railroad in the US. It began service in Florida in 2018 and has steadily increased its footprint along the east coast of the state from Miami to Orlando and has plans to expand its network from Orlando to Tampa. It also recently broke ground on Brightline West, which is expected to connect the 200-plus miles between Southern California and Las Vegas with all-electric, high-speed service beginning in 2028.

Bonds related to Brightline’s Florida projects have come under pressure in 2025 and have been subject to downgrades from rating agencies citing lower-than-expected ridership and higher costs as well as dwindling cash reserves and other liquidity concerns. In July, Brightline announced that it would defer its mid-month interest payment on a lone subordinate tranche of debt; while this did not qualify as a default based on the structure of the affected issues, the news weighed on the prices of other uninsured bond tranches. However, certain of Brightline Florida’s “commuter” bonds were retired in mid-August at a price above par as part of mandatory redemption— explaining their contribution to fund performance—and were replaced with a new issue featuring a higher coupon rate and enhanced structural provisions.

Fortress Investment Group is pursuing a broad equity raise of the Brightline franchise which could be finalized over the next couple of quarters. Proceeds of any future equity sale would be utilized to redeem outstanding subordinate debt whose bond valuations have been negatively impacted over the past three months. This would be a positive future catalyst if successfully executed. In the interim, recent operating trends have been bullish. The company has put into service 20 standard cars over the past several months and appears to be growing into its expanded seat capacity nicely, posting year-over-year increases in both short- and long-distance passengers. The delivery of 10 new premium cars by year end should enhance average long-distance fares and improve ridership trends within the premium fare class, which have been a drag. In addition, the company is planning to implement a schedule change in the fourth quarter to better align network capacity with fluctuating demand.

All in all, we remain confident in Brightline’s ability to meet its obligations as it continues to mature, and we believe the attractive coupons on offer adequately compensate us for the risk involved.

Though structurally independent from the company’s Florida operations, Brightline West bonds have often traded in sympathy with the Florida issues. Prices moved higher during the quarter as Brightline West announced plans to refund an outstanding bond tranche at the stipulated above-par price sometime during the fourth quarter. Meanwhile, the price tag for the Brightline West project has climbed thanks to inflation pressures. To absorb these higher construction costs, Brightline West has applied for a $6 billion Railroad Rehabilitation Improvement Financing loan from the Federal government to absorb construction costs that have risen to $21 billion from the previous estimate of $15 billion. This loan represents a far more cost-effective approach to financing than the higher-cost bank loans that were originally expected to fund a good portion of construction costs, and we believe it is very likely to be approved given the favorable views of the Brightline franchise held by the Trump administration and Department of Transportation.

The top-performing bonds during the quarter were issued by a Westchester County, New York, authority to refinance debt and provide working capital as new management begins to turn the health system around. Also trading higher were bonds issued by the Tulsa Municipal Airport on behalf of American Airlines to finance improvements in the carrier’s overhaul and maintenance base.

The leading detractors in the quarter were linked to the aforementioned Brightline passenger rail projects in Florida and California/ Nevada and a mall in New Jersey.

A relatively small holding in the portfolio, PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes) bonds associated with the American Dream entertainment and retail center in the Meadowlands Sports Complex are secured by tax payments that are based on the assessed value of the property. A reduction in the mall’s assessed value—and thus payments to be made to bondholders—by both the local taxing authority and a tax court judge have weighed on the bonds’ prices.

We appreciate your confidence and thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
First Eagle Investments

Asset Class