Healthcare Credit Opportunities Amid Heightened Uncertainty

The healthcare sector has moved past the disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, but new regulatory and legislative risks have emerged alongside the potential macroeconomic challenges of tariffs and renewed inflation. Despite the heightened uncertainty facing healthcare companies, we believe the sector’s defensive characteristics are a likely source of stability. The need for healthcare is not dependent upon GDP growth, in our view, and structural demand is well supported by aging US demographics.

Healthcare is a broad economic sector, however, and a range of trajectories are likely across subsectors. To capture the diverse factors driving a healthcare company’s creditworthiness, from the perspective of both direct lenders and loan investors, analysis should extend beyond typical metrics like profitability, margins and balance-sheet strength. For example, a provider’s payor mixes the ratio of revenues from government programs like Medicare and Medicaid, private insurance coverage and direct consumer payment—can significantly impact profitability and margins. So, too, can its geographic exposure, as strong national demand for healthcare can camouflage regional, demographic-based variations. Meanwhile, certain subsectors appear to face outsized legislative and regulatory risks under the Trump administration.

In today’s evolving environment, our current preferred subsectors include:

  • Revenue cycle management and payor services/cost containment, which have historically generated strong margins and highly recurring revenue streams and are largely insulated from tariff and legislative risks
  • Behavioral health, where growing demand for services is outpacing the supply of providers
  • Outpatient surgery/ambulatory care centers, which tend to have lower cost structures and more favorable exposures to private-pay revenues than hospitals/acute care facilities 

Regardless of business line, the strongest companies, in our view, will be those able to manage through any potential headwinds by right-sizing their cost structures and/or negotiating higher reimbursement rates from commercial payors, as well as optimizing their footprint to more provider-friendly jurisdictions.

 

The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the firm. These materials are provided for informational purposes only. These opinions are not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results, or investment advice. Any statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy of this information cannot be guaranteed. The views expressed herein may change at any time subsequent to the date of issue hereof. The information provided is not to be construed as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell or the solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any fund or security.

Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Disclosures

All investments involve the risk of loss of principal.

Municipal bonds are subject to credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and call risk. However, the obligations of some municipal issuers may not be enforceable through the exercise of traditional creditors’ rights. The reorganization under federal bankruptcy laws of a municipal bond issuer may result in the bonds being cancelled without payment or repaid only in part, or in delays in collecting principal and interest.

The information is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting or tax advice. Any tax information presented is not intended to constitute an analysis of all tax considerations.

Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.

A credit rating is an assessment provided by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) of credit worthiness of an issuer with respect to debt obligations, including specific securities, money market instruments, or other bonds. Ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA/Aaa (highest) to D/RD (lowest); ratings are subject to change without notice. Not Rated (NR) indicates that the debtor was not rated and should not be interpreted as indicating low quality.

Yield to Worst (YTW) is a financial metric that helps investors assess the minimum yield they can expect from a bond under various scenarios. It accounts for the bond’s yield in the worst-case scenario, considering factors like call provisions, prepayments, and other features that may affect the bond’s cash flows.

FEF Distributors, LLC (“FEFD”) (SIPC), a limited purpose broker-dealer, distributes certain First Eagle products. FEFD does not provide services to any investor but rather provides services to its First Eagle affiliates. As such, when FEFD presents a fund, strategy or other product to a prospective investor, FEFD and its representatives do not determine whether an investment in the fund, strategy or other product is in the best interests of, or is otherwise beneficial or suitable for, the investor. No statement by FEFD should be construed as a recommendation. Investors should exercise their own judgment and/or consult with a financial professional to determine whether it is advisable for the investor to invest in any First Eagle fund, strategy or product.

First Eagle Investments is the brand name for First Eagle Investment Management, LLC and its subsidiary investment advisers.

©2025 First Eagle Investment Management, LLC. All rights reserved.