Commentaries

High Yield Municipal Fund Commentary

High Yield Municipal Fund Commentary

Market Overview

As of December 31, 2025

During the fourth quarter, the municipal bond market continued to rebound from the challenges of the first half of 2025.

Record-setting bond issuance continued to be met by strong demand, enabling muni indexes to post positive returns for the quarter and the year. The S&P Municipal Bond High Yield Index gained 1.5% during the fourth quarter, while the S&P Municipal Yield Index, which includes bonds across the quality spectrum, rose 1.7% and the S&P Short Duration Municipal Yield Index advanced 0.6%. Those indexes were up a respective 3.3%, 3.5% and 4.3% in full-year 2025. For context, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index gained 1.1% during the quarter and 7.3% in the year.1

Market Able to Absorb Record Levels of Muni Issuance

Though the pace of muni bond issuance eased somewhat in the fourth quarter, the $100 billion-plus of new issuance during the period was enough to drive the market to a new annual high of $580 billion, about 13% above the previous record set in 2024. It’s worth noting that the vast majority of issuance during the year was new capital, with refunding activity accounting for only about 12%.2 Lower levels of refunding transactions suggest fewer bonds are being called, which can help support valuations for the market as a whole.

We were not surprised to see the municipal bond curve steepen considerably during 2025. The flood of issuance—high yield muni issuance in particular, given its long-dated nature, generally provides a steepening impulse to the yield curve—pushed long yields higher, although Federal Reserve policy rate cuts weighed on the short end of the muni curve.3 The US Treasury curve also steepened over the year as term premia returned to the Treasury market after being mostly negative for nearly a decade.4

There are a few factors we believe have contributed to the ongoing surge in issuance. After sitting on the sidelines during the 2022–23 rate-hike period, municipalities have a pent-up need to issue paper as the benefits of Covid-era federal funding and post-pandemic tax receipts wane. Meanwhile, pretty much every capital project costs more today from the impact of inflation across inputs like steel, concrete and lumber, and increased costs for civil engineering, skilled and unskilled labor, etc. Further, potential legislative threats to muni bond tax treatment in the first half of the year—since alleviated—likely pulled forward some issuance.

Fortunately, the US government shutdown that began on October 1 did not have the same chilling effect on demand as the Liberation Day tariff announcements in April, and massive issuance was met by robust demand throughout the fourth quarter. Flows into municipal bond mutual funds and exchange traded funds ended the year strong, amounting to about $23 billion in the fourth quarter, which represented more than one-third of full-year 2025 flows.5

The Fed’s dovish tilt in the second half of the year has also supported demand for muni bonds. Though it was cut off from official federal agency data during the government shutdown, the Fed followed up its September rate cut with another in October. The catch-up in economic data flow, after federal employees returned to work in mid-November, did little to change the central bank’s viewpoint, which seemed to center more on a weakening labor market than inflation concerns, and an additional December cut brought the federal funds rate down to 3.50–3.75% to end the year.6

The Fed appears well-positioned to wait and see how the economy evolves, and the dot plot of rate projections published in December points to only one additional 25 basis point cut in 2026.7 That said, the Trump administration’s very public desire for lower rates and conflict with Fed Chair Powell—highlighted by early-January reports that the Department of Justice had opened a criminal investigation into Powell related to the renovation of the Fed’s headquarters—suggest that whoever replaces Powell when his term as Fed chair ends in May 2026 is likely to be more dovish than the average governor. In a world of increasingly lower floating-rate yields, investors may increasingly view fixed-rate municipal bonds as a more appealing cash equivalent.

Fundamentals Remain Steady

The initial estimate of third quarter GDP for the US came in at 4.3%, up from 3.8% in the second quarter and well above the consensus estimate of 3.3%. While growth in the fourth quarter is likely to be negatively impacted by the government shutdown, fiscal stimulus from High Yield Municipal Fund First Eagle High Yield Municipal Fund page 2 First Eagle Investments the 2025 tax bill and potential monetary stimulus should be supportive of economic activity in 2026, to the ongoing benefit of municipal issuer fundamentals.8

Municipalities entered 2025 in strong fiscal condition, and issuer fundamentals continue to be supportive. State budgets for fiscal 2026 overall reflect a healthy environment, and general fund balances remain well above the historical average even as they continue to ease from 2023’s peak. Though state general fund revenue has fallen off the record pace of fiscal 2021 and 2022 as the impact of Covid–era relief waned, it has continued to grow, and modest revenue gains are expected in fiscal 2026. Budgets enacted to date suggest flat general fund spending in 2026, and most states plan to maintain or increase the size of their rainy-day fund—many of which are already at nominal highs—in anticipation of future needs.9

Another sign of fiscal strength can be found in improved pension funding, as the aggregate median ratio for local-government pensions climbed to 80% in fiscal 2024 from 78% in fiscal 2022. While this can be attributed in part to market performance, local governments have increased contributions and tweaked their benefit structures, demonstrating improved funding discipline and better long-term sustainability.10

Overall, muni bond ratings activity has been positive in 2025, but not by much: Positive activity (including both upgrades and favorable outlook revisions) outpaced negative activity at a rate of 1.4x year to date through November.11 Both defaults and first-time distressed debt remained very low in 2025.12

Start of a Turnaround?

Muni bond performance in 2025 was a tale of two halves, and we’re encouraged by the asset class’s momentum in the second half. It seems likely to us that the factors driving recent performance and fund flows—credit stability, certainty around tax treatment, an accommodative Fed and relatively benign tariff impacts—will continue to support the asset class, even in what is expected to be another year of robust issuance.

As a team, we remain focused on seeking to provide a high level of tax-free current income through bottom-up security selection complemented by an active trading strategy and the prudent application of leverage. This approach, combined with consistent fund inflows, has enabled us to increase the interest income generated by the portfolio in 2025, and we have passed this along to shareholders in the form of a higher monthly distribution rate.13

Portfolio Review

High Yield Municipal Fund A Shares (without sales charge*) posted a return of –0.25% in fourth quarter 2025. The Fund underperformed the S&P Municipal Yield Index in the period.

While municipal bonds issued by Puerto Rico account for more than 8% of the benchmark index, we take a highly selective approach to buying paper issued by the territory. Investing in US territories entails unique legal and political risks not typical of the broader municipal bond market and must be approached with additional diligence. Revenue bonds backed by toll roads were among the few Puerto Rico issues that have met our investment criteria, and they were a strong contributor to fourth-quarter performance. The roads in question connect several of the island’s key economic hubs. Issued with a BBB rating in 2024, these bonds were upgraded to BBB+ in December by Fitch, citing positive traffic and revenue trends supportive of stronger financial metrics, and price appreciation resulted.

In contrast with our holdings for Puerto Rico, healthcare represents a significant exposure for the Fund. Senior care and senior living are areas within healthcare where we think fundamental analysis may help identify attractive bonds that stand to benefit from the “silver tsunami” of Americans who will retire by 2030. While this sector has recovered from Covid-19 disruptions, it still accounted for a meaningful portion of the first-time muni defaults in 2025, which is why we prioritize the bonds of well-managed senior living facilities that are located in growing states and are less dependent on government-subsidized residents. Among the largest contributors to fourth-quarter performance were bonds issued by Sanctuary LTC, which owns a portfolio of more than 20 nonprofit lifecare facilities in attractive markets in Texas, Oklahoma and Colorado.

Bonds related to the Brightline passenger rail project in Florida comprised the biggest detractors to performance in the fourth quarter. Brightline, which is backed by private equity firm Fortress Investment Group, is the only privately owned and operated intercity railroad in the US. It began service in Florida in 2018 and has steadily increased its footprint along the east coast of the state from Miami to Orlando and has plans to expand its network from Orlando to Tampa.

These bonds came under fire in 2025 and were subject to downgrades from rating agencies citing lower-than-expected ridership and higher costs as well as dwindling cash reserves and other liquidity concerns. In July, Brightline announced that it would defer its mid-month interest payment on certain tranches of debt, news to which markets reacted very negatively, which we believe was an overreaction. Outstanding Brightline bonds continue to trade at deep discounts.

Despite Brightline’s recent difficulties, we remain constructive on both the project and the bonds. The negative market sentiment largely has been priced into the bonds, in our view, substantially reducing our downside risk in 2026 while enhancing our upside potential. Meanwhile, recent trends at the company have been bullish.

Operational improvements in 2025—including the addition of 30 new train cars and a complete schedule revamp to improve network optimization—have put Brightline on the verge of finally generating positive monthly cash flow. This operational momentum will have a direct impact on the ability of Fortress Investments (Brightline’s owner) to attract equity investors and raise substantial additional funds to improve Brightline’s capital structure and pay down higher coupon debt as well as deferred interest. We have been told that potential equity investors are spending significant time and money on due diligence efforts.

In January 2026, Brightline announced the appointment of Nicolas Petrovic as CEO of Brightline Holdings LLC. Petrovic has more than 25 years of rail experience, with leadership positions across Europe and the Middle East, including with Eurostar, Siemens France and, most recently, Etihad Rail Mobility. In our view, Brightline’s ability to lure such a tenured and respected CEO to Florida at this stage of his career speaks volumes about the company’s prospects going forward.

In short, we believe outstanding Brightline bonds have been oversold and that the combination of operational momentum, new leadership and a likely equity infusion suggests substantial recovery potential.

We appreciate your confidence and thank you for your support.

Sincerely,
First Eagle Investments